The Enigmatic Power of the Flag
We all know the old adage that a picture is worth a thousand words. Indeed, a painting may convey the full range of human emotion, the worldly condition of its subjects and their relationship with a higher power or practice, all with an economy of masterful strokes that a hefty tome cannot describe. Symbols, likewise—not so much for what they inherently convey, but for the meaning we invest them with—convey almost as much information as a painting. Which brings me to the flag of the United States of America.
According to a U.S. Government website, “The flag's 13 red
and white stripes represent the 13 original colonies. Its 50 white stars on a
blue background represent the 50 states.” Furthermore, the red stands for “valor
and bravery,” white stands for “purity and innocence,” and blue stands for
"vigilance, perseverance, and justice.” But how does this description even
begin to do justice to the emotions felt by a family member of someone who has died
“fighting for that flag” or a recent immigrant looking upon it for the first
time as a naturalized citizen?
![]() |
The author with his newly acquired U.S. flag |
The potential to convey such deep emotion is what gives the
flag its power. Trying to understand it in purely rational terms cannot do it
justice. For instance, I recall trying to make sense of the Pledge of
Allegiance: “I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America,
and to the Republic for which it stands…” Even my schoolboy self understood
that the flag was a symbol representing the country. So, when we pledged
allegiance to the flag AND to that for which it stands, I was confused. Are we really
pledging allegiance to this inanimate piece of fabric IN ADDITION to what it
represents? What does that even mean? Of course, my questioning of the “one Nation
under God” part would soon follow. But that’s another story.
Yes, the flag is a powerful emotional symbol. As such, it
would benefit us all if we could agree on precisely what it means to fly it. But
we don’t. It’s especially difficult when we try to embellish or modify it or use
it in a sentence (so to speak) instead of simply letting it stand on its own. For
instance, what does it mean when someone flies the U.S. flag alongside a flag
representing their political candidate of choice? Are they merely saying that
their candidate would be best for the country, or are they somehow equating or
conflating both candidate and country? After all, if the U.S. flag is flown
with a state flag, for comparison’s sake, protocol states that the U.S. flag
should be flown higher or in a manner that signifies higher status.
You may also have noticed a trend of late whereby the flag is
modified in a way to honor some subset of the U.S. populace. For instance, the
“thin blue line” flag is meant to honor law enforcement. The “thin red line”
flag honors firefighters. Are these flags held in higher esteem than the official
red, white, and blue one? It would seem so, since they are often displayed by
themselves. What does that say about the true allegiance of the flyer of such a
flag? These are definitely not the flag to which our kids are pledging
allegiance.
![]() |
Recent variations of the U.S. flag |
And then there are the grayscale or black and white versions
of the flag. These might actually be easy to understand if, in fact, they are
conveying a protest or political statement related to the “colors” of this
country having faded. In other words, the dream that was fought for is gone,
stolen, or in dire need of resuscitation. But such a monochromatic flag might
also signify mourning after a national disaster such as on 9/11. The timing and
context might shed light on the message, or not. It might just be that the flyer
(or wearer) of such a flag has Goth or heavy metal fashion sensibilities. Again, such flags
are not the flag of the United States of America to which people pledge
allegiance.
Which brings me to the red, white, and blue adorned punisher
skull. For my way of thinking, this is one of the more straightforward adaptations
of the flag. It speaks to me of a worldview without nuance, hope, goodness, or
grace. It speaks to me of violence, retribution, and a lack of empathy and humanity.
In fact, I’m sorry to say that it seems a fitting representation of the nation
we’ve become of late. However, I still have faith that it is not the flag to
which people are pledging allegiance.
I must admit, I’ve been rather ambivalent toward the flag for
most of my life. From my first ponderings of the Pledge of Allegiance to my
realizations regarding our theft of land and people and our pursuit of unjust
wars, it’s been difficult for me to fully embrace the flag without being able
to add an abundance of footnotes and asterisked annotations to my flying its
colors. It’s not that I don’t have gratitude towards those who put their lives
on the line fighting for the liberty that I now enjoy. I very much do. It’s
just that those who did fly the flag seemed to me, from my place of prejudice, to
lack an appreciable understanding of what we’ve done as a nation and the
suffering we’ve caused. And so, perhaps with some arrogance, I was not quick to
want to join them in such a public display of uncomplicated patriotism.
Besides, I’ve long considered myself a citizen of the world.
To fly a flag of this nation seemed to be committing a violent act of
separation from all other nations of the world. For what it’s worth, though, I’m
even less inclined to fly the so-called Buddhist flag. Believe it or not, there
is one, and it strikes me as patently un-Buddhist! But I digress.
Find a running list of all posts in this series by clicking here.
Images
All images courtesy of the author except for those used to compile the montage of modified flags.
Copyright 2025 by Mark Robert Frank
Comments
Post a Comment