Faith and Faux Knowledge

-
We're experiencing a deficit of faith right now. Its lack corrodes our institutions, and erodes our social discourse. But whether you count yourself among the faithful, or the faithless, don’t assume that you know what I mean just yet.

This may well chafe some atheists who might be reading this, but you have faith as well. It’s just that, whereas a Christian places his or her faith in the existence of God, or the Resurrection of Christ, an atheist might place it in love, science, the potential goodness of humanity, or even the prospect that we’d all be a whole lot better off without religion! Yes, we all live our lives by placing faith in someone, or something. And when we find ourselves in general agreement with others regarding the metaphysical concepts in which we have faith, then we might begin to call ourselves members of a particular faith tradition.



So, where’s the deficit? How can I profess to such an expansive definition of faith even as I claim that its lack is so destructive to that which we hold dear? Here’s the crux: so many who profess strong faith are actually confusing it with the attainment of certain knowledge. And not only do we tend to confuse our personal faith with certain knowledge, we also seem ever at the ready to act as if this certain knowledge applies to everyone else as well. However, the relationship between faith and knowledge, as best I can discern, is that a long-lasting, personally tested faith might afford you a working knowledge as to what is true for you – and nothing more. No matter how strong your faith, no matter what you might believe, no matter what personal truth you might have come to realize, Truth is still beyond your apprehension/comprehension – as well as mine.

Since I’m usually the only Buddhist in the room these days, any religious discussion that I’m involved in becomes something of an interfaith dialogue. And being married to a Christian pastor means that these interfaith discussions are most often Buddhist/Christian in nature. So, recently some of us were having a conversation about faith, and I stated that it was my experience that faith is all too often confused with knowledge – just as I’ve been expounding upon here. The concern regarding this statement was that it would send us down the slippery slope of relativism, where all truth is subjective, and there is no gauge with which to measure good and bad.

Indeed, I was talking about relativism, but not in the way that this person thought I was, I don’t think. I wasn’t saying that there is no Truth. My contention was/is that, whatever capital T Truth might exist (its existence is something I must take on faith, by the way) we can only ever glimpse it either partially or through a glass darkly.

And why do I think this distinction between faith and faux knowledge is such an important one to make? Our current events are rife with struggles between various entities: individuals, classes, religions, party-line adherents, and nations. Each is convinced of their absolute rightness, and their firm grasp of capital T Truth. This belief in our absolute rightness (and the absolute wrongness of our foes) is corroding our institutions, and eroding our social discourse.

I think this distinction between faith and faux knowledge is an especially important one to make if we're going to take part in interfaith dialogue of any kind. Sure, I could feign humility when entering into conversation with people of different faith traditions. I could bury my belief in the absolute rightness of my views so deep down inside me that no one was the wiser – perhaps not even me! But what good would that do? Every attempt at interfaith dialogue that I might engage in would surely be corrupted into a one-sided exercise in proselytism. No real learning would take place. No mutual understanding would be advanced. No greater peace would result. For how can there be real peace between us when I’m convinced of the inferior nature of the faith that your life experience has brought you to? No, true humility requires of us a willingness to be changed by another – by every other.

So let us keep our faith. Let us live whatever faith we’ve come to enjoy. And let us strive to keep our faith from slipping into the trap of faux knowledge – for our own wellbeing as well as that of all humanity. 


Image
Evening sun through the groundcover in the bottomlands, courtesy of the author


Copyright 2020 by Mark Robert Frank

Comments

  1. Matah HatiJuly 15, 2020 at 11:03 PM

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dogen's 'Flower of Emptiness' - Part 2

-
Image
Dogen’s Shobogenzo contains a fascicle known as Kuge , or Flower of Emptiness . As discussed in Part 1, kuge is a term that is sometimes used to describe apparitions caused by cataracts or some other eye disease – ‘flowers in the sky’, so to speak. Within the context of a Buddhist discussion, kuge is sometimes used in reference to our obscured vision of ‘ things as it is ’ – vision which presumably becomes clarified over the course of our meditative practice. In Kuge , Dogen uses our more commonsensical understanding of ‘flowers in the sky’ as a means to discuss the true nature of emptiness , shunyata , as he understands it. Thus, the translation of Kuge as The Flower of Emptiness (Nishiyama, 1975). For those who have not yet had the opportunity to read Part 1 , I will reiterate the caution regarding interpreting in a nihilistic way Buddhist teachings related to emptiness . Without correct understanding of emptiness we might misinterpret the teaching that no thing
Read more

A Buddhist Takes Communion / A Buddhist Take On Communion

-
Image
Then he took a loaf of bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it and gave it to them, saying, “This is my body, which is given for you. Do this in remembrance of me.” And he did the same with the cup after supper, saying, “This cup that is poured out for you is the new covenant in my blood.” – Luke 22:19-20, NRSV   Yes, at the risk of prompting the eyes of many Buddhist-leaning readers to begin glazing over (What, is this going to be a sermon or something?), and at the risk of prompting the eyes of many Christian-leaning readers to narrow in suspicion (What does this Buddhist know about Christianity, anyway?), I’m going consider how the Lord’s Supper might appear if viewed through a Buddhist lens. In doing so I hope that Buddhist and Christian alike will glimpse something that leads to deeper spiritual understanding within each respective tradition.       Perhaps a little personal background will assuage your curiosity as to why I’m even considering such a top
Read more

Six Types of Happiness in Hesse's 'Journey to the East'

-
Image
Every so often I find myself drawn to one of the books of my youth. Part nostalgic reflection, part introspective rediscovery, part discovery anew, rereading a great work of literature after many years of lived experience can be an interesting endeavor. I first read Herman Hesse’s The Journey to the East back in my youth. I’d been introduced to his work when I read Demian for a college humanities class, and I then went on to read Steppenwolf , Siddhartha , and “ The Journey ” in fairly quick succession. For some reason, though, I subsequently began and then abandoned mid-read The Glass Bead Game ( Magister Ludi ). Perhaps it’s fitting that I should wait until later in life to finish that one given the fact that it was Hesse’s final novel and all. Such a thought especially resonates with me now that I’ve discovered that I am presently the same age that Hesse was upon completion of The Journey – a realization that has me wondering whether I finally have enough life experience in my
Read more